A Reel typically reaches far more people than a feed post on the same account, and many creators charge only a small premium for one.
Brands know this gap exists. Knowing it too is how you close it. Not knowing is how brands take advantage of you.
If you've been quoting a Reel at $1,100 and a feed post at $900, you've already sensed the math doesn't quite hold. This guide will show you why it doesn't, what a defensible multiplier actually looks like, and how to explain the difference to a brand that pushes back.
The Short Answer: How Much to Charge for Reels vs. Feed Posts
Base rates for Reels run roughly 85–95% higher than base rates for feed posts at the same follower count. That's not an arbitrary markup — it reflects a genuine difference in what each format delivers.
Here's what Selah's pricing engine returns for each deliverable, by tier:
| Follower Count | Instagram Feed Post | Instagram Reel | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25K | $450 | $850 | ~89% |
| 50K | $800 | $1,550 | ~94% |
| 100K | $1,450 | $2,800 | ~93% |
| 250K | $3,200 | $6,100 | ~91% |
| 500K | $5,700 | $11,000 | ~93% |
These are base rates — no usage rights, exclusivity, boosting, or other add-ons included.
Many guides online recommend much smaller gaps. Selah is built for the creator side: you should be paid what the format is actually worth, not what brands are used to paying.
Try it free — no login needed →
Why Reels Are Worth More Than Feed Posts
The pricing gap exists because the deliverables genuinely aren't equivalent. Three things drive it.
Algorithmic reach
Instagram's algorithm distributes Reels to non-followers through the Explore page, Reels tab, and algorithmic recommendations in users' feeds. A feed post is surfaced primarily to your existing audience. On the same account, a Reel will typically reach many more unique viewers than a static feed post, and a significant portion of those viewers have no prior relationship with you.
For a brand, that non-follower reach is extremely valuable. They're paying to access your audience. With a Reel, they're getting your audience plus the algorithm's distribution on top of it.
Production effort
A feed post can be a single photograph with a caption. A Reel requires scripting, filming (often multiple takes), editing, audio selection, captions or graphics, and a specific short-form performance style that takes real skill. The labor differential is meaningful. Brands don't price this into their initial offers because they'd rather you didn't think about it.
Native format and viewer intent
People watching Reels are in discovery mode. They're scrolling content from accounts they don't follow, actively open to new products and ideas.
Feed post viewers are in relationship mode. They're checking in on accounts they already care about. Viewer intent affects conversion, and brands building performance campaigns know this. A Reel viewer who has never heard of the brand is more likely to click through than a feed viewer who already follows a creator but has tuned out the sponsored content.
Together, these three factors explain why the pricing gap between Reels and feed posts is larger than most creators set it.
When platform algorithm changes affect your rate
Instagram's algorithm shifts constantly, and the value of Reels relative to feed posts has fluctuated with it. When reach for static posts was depressed in 2022–2023, the gap was widest. Recent algorithm changes have partially restored feed post reach — but Reels still maintain a meaningful distribution advantage for accounts under 500K.
The practical implication: if a brand points to a moment when feed posts performed unusually well as a reason to narrow the gap, they're cherry-picking. The structural advantage of Reels persists. Hold your multiplier.
The Multiplier Logic: What a Defensible Gap Looks Like
If you want a number to anchor on: price your Reel at roughly 1.85–1.95× your feed post rate. That range reflects the production premium, the distribution premium, and what the format actually delivers in campaign value.
Here's how that plays out in practice. A creator with 100K followers who quotes a feed post at $1,450 should quote a Reel in the range of $2,100–$3,600. The lower end of the Reel range is still well above the feed post rate, and there's room to negotiate from the top of the range down — not from an underprice up.
If you've been charging only a small premium for Reels, you've been leaving the production premium on the table entirely. The gap you're creating is the room you'd need to cover:
- Script and shot planning
- Filming time (Reels typically require more takes than a static shot)
- Editing and audio
- The performance required to hook a non-follower audience in three seconds
That's a different deliverable. Price it like one.
The exception: when to charge the same rate
There are legitimate scenarios where a Reel and a feed post warrant the same price:
The brand provides the creative. If the brand is supplying a script, specific shot requirements, and an approval layer that turns the Reel into a highly constrained execution — closer to UGC production than organic creative work — the distribution premium still applies, but the creative premium shrinks. In this case, the production multiplier is lower, though the usage rights conversation becomes more important.
The Reel is clearly underperforming on your account. If your analytics consistently show Reel reach matching or falling below feed post reach (unusual but not impossible, especially for accounts in niches that don't favor Reels), you can't charge for algorithmic distribution that isn't happening. Your data should drive the conversation.
It's a cross-post. If the brand is asking you to film one piece of content and post it as both a feed post and a Reel, that's a cross-post scenario with its own pricing logic. The second format is priced at 50% of that format's standalone rate — it's still a separate line item, not a freebie.
Add-Ons That Shift Reel Pricing Further
This is where most creators leave money on the table.
Because Reels reach more people and perform better in ad environments, brands are more likely to request add-ons on Reel deliverables than on feed posts. And those add-ons compound directly on a higher base rate — which means getting your base right matters even more on a Reel.
Boosting rights and Spark Codes. If a brand wants to run your Reel as a paid ad from their account, that's paid usage rights on top of your content fee. If they want to use a Spark Code — running the ad from your account — that's whitelisting, which carries a higher premium than standard paid usage. Whitelisting for 30 days adds $2,100 on a $2,800 Reel (the 100K rate). For 90 days, it's $2,800. These figures are for usage rights on the Reel alone.
Brands ask for Spark Codes on Reels specifically because the format performs in the ad environment. They know exactly what they're getting. Make sure you do too. (If you want the full picture on this, how to price a Spark Code in a TikTok brand deal covers the equivalent mechanics on TikTok — the same logic applies to Instagram's boosting framework.)
Exclusivity. A brand that wants six months of category exclusivity alongside a Reel campaign is getting more from the exclusivity than they would from a feed-post campaign, because your Reel reach is larger. The exclusivity fee is calculated on the content fee regardless — but this is a reason to hold firm on the base Reel rate before layering exclusivity on top.
Usage duration. Brands often ask for 90-day usage rights without specifying the format. If the deliverable is a Reel, 90 days of paid usage adds $1,500 to a $2,800 Reel. Same 90 days on a feed post base rate costs the brand substantially less — which is another reason you want the base rate right before the usage conversation starts.
For a full breakdown of how usage rights stack onto your base rate, how much to charge for usage rights as an influencer covers the complete framework.
A Real Deal Breakdown
A beauty creator with 100K followers receives a brief from a skincare brand. They want one Instagram Reel, 90 days of paid usage rights to run it in their ads, and one month of category exclusivity in the skincare space.
| Line item | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1× Instagram Reel | $2,800 |
| 1-month exclusivity | $800 |
| 3-month paid usage rights | $1,500 |
| Total | $5,100 |
Without the add-ons, she might have quoted $2,800 and called it done. The usage rights and exclusivity represent a significant portion of the deal's total value — and both are calculated on the Reel base rate, not a feed post rate.
If she had priced the Reel at a feed post rate with a 25% premium, she would have started from a lower base, and every downstream calculation would be proportionally smaller. Getting the base right is how the total gets to a number worth saying yes to.
How to Explain the Difference to a Brand
Brands will occasionally push back on the gap between Reel and feed post rates. The pushback usually sounds like: "We've always paid about the same for both" or "It's all Instagram content."
You don't need to give a lecture. A short, confident answer works:
"A Reel reaches a significantly larger audience than a feed post, including non-followers who haven't seen my content before. It also requires scripting, filming, and editing time that a static post doesn't. The rate reflects both the distribution value and the production scope."
That's it. You've named the distribution premium and the production premium without apologizing for either. If they push further, ask them to share the brief's campaign goal — a brand optimizing for awareness has very strong reasons to want Reel distribution, and you can anchor the conversation there.
Most guides on brand deal pricing are written for brands. The rates you'll find if you search this question from the brand side will be lower than what the format commands. That framing is intentional. Use your own numbers.
Your rate for a Reel and your rate for a feed post should tell a story. A 20% gap says "I'm not totally sure these are different." A 90% gap — the one backed by production cost, algorithmic reach, and viewer intent — says you've done the math. Brands who've also done the math will recognize it. The ones who haven't will learn.
Try it free — no login needed →
Frequently Asked Questions
How much to charge for Reels vs. feed posts as a general rule? Price your Reel at roughly 1.85–1.95× your feed post rate. That range accounts for the production premium and the distribution advantage Reels carry through Instagram's algorithm. A small markup — advice you'll see elsewhere — doesn't reflect either.
Why do Reels cost more than Instagram feed posts for brand deals? Three reasons: Reels reach non-followers through algorithmic distribution (typically far more total reach), they require more production work than static posts, and they reach viewers who are actively in discovery mode rather than just checking in on accounts they follow. Each factor contributes to the rate gap.
Should I charge more for a Reel if the brand wants to boost it? Yes — boosting is a separate add-on on top of your content fee. If the brand is running the Reel as a paid ad from their account, that's paid usage rights. If they want to boost it from your account using an ad code or Spark Code, that's whitelisting, which carries a higher premium. Both are priced as a percentage of your base Reel rate, scaled by duration.
When should I charge the same rate for a Reel and a feed post? Two situations: if your Reel analytics show reach consistently matching your feed post reach (making the distribution premium unsupported by data), or if the brand is providing the creative and the Reel is essentially a constrained UGC execution rather than an original branded piece. In the second case, the production premium shrinks, though usage rights still apply at full weight.
How do I explain the Reel vs. feed post rate difference to a brand that resists? Keep it factual and brief: Reels reach a larger audience including non-followers, and require scripting, filming, and editing beyond what a static post involves. The rate reflects both. You don't need to justify the multiplier at length — stating it plainly and holding it is the move.